Legal Opinion
Arbuckle Wilderness, Inc. v. KFOR-TV, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided March 29, 1993No. Civ-92-2063-APublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ALLEY, District Judge.
This stated as a defamation action in which plaintiffs Arbuckle Wilderness, Inc. and Gerald D. Hagee (“the plaintiffs”) initially alleged that a series of news stories broadcast by defendant KFOR-TV in December 1991 and January 1992 injured their reputations.1 On December 17, 1992, Mr. Gregory G. Meier, counsel for the plaintiffs, filed an Application For Leave Of Court To Amend Complaint And Brief In Support and an Amended Complaint, proposing to add Dr. Robert Har-tin and Mr. Mark Mesesan to the action as defendants. As the addition of Dr. Hardin would have…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Frederick Lawrence White, Jr. Benjamin L. Staponski, Jr., and Gwen G. Caranchini v. General Motors Corporation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Steve Rodgers v. Lincoln Towing Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Dodd Insurance Services, Inc. And Tom Dodd, Jr. v. Royal Insurance Company of America, an Illinois Corporation F/k/a Royal-Globe Insurance CompaniesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re NotaryUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2016
- Arbuckle Wilderness, Inc. v. KFOR TV, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996