Legal Opinion

Herman A. Stuhl v. G. Joseph Tauro

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided March 29, 1973No. 72-1390PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellant has conceded that the sole issue to be decided is whether the district court erroneously denied plaintiff’s request for a three-judge court. We conclude that the district court was correct in its determination, although we do not find it necessary anew to reach the issue of whether a substantial federal question was presented, preferring instead to rest our decision upon principles of res judicata and direct estoppel.

Plaintiff-Appellant’s complaint, with one addition hereinafter described, is practically identical to one he filed against the same…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Angel v. BullingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. John A. Acree v. Air Line Pilots AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  3. Crown Coat Front Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. LaBarbera v. BatschOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Jose Estevez v. Horace A. Nabers, Acting Officer in Charge, New Orleans Office Immigration& Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions. Joseph B. KauffmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
  2. Wright MacHine Corp. v. Seaman-Andwall Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  3. Michael F. Walsh, Etc. v. International Longshoremen's Association, Afl-Cio, Local 799, International Longshoremen's Association, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
  4. Superior Oil Co. v. City of Port Arthur, Tex.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1982
  5. City Capital Resources, Inc. v. WhiteDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API