Herman A. Stuhl v. G. Joseph Tauro
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant has conceded that the sole issue to be decided is whether the district court erroneously denied plaintiff’s request for a three-judge court. We conclude that the district court was correct in its determination, although we do not find it necessary anew to reach the issue of whether a substantial federal question was presented, preferring instead to rest our decision upon principles of res judicata and direct estoppel.
Plaintiff-Appellant’s complaint, with one addition hereinafter described, is practically identical to one he filed against the same…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Angel v. BullingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- John A. Acree v. Air Line Pilots AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Crown Coat Front Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- LaBarbera v. BatschOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Jose Estevez v. Horace A. Nabers, Acting Officer in Charge, New Orleans Office Immigration& Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions. Joseph B. KauffmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
- Wright MacHine Corp. v. Seaman-Andwall Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Michael F. Walsh, Etc. v. International Longshoremen's Association, Afl-Cio, Local 799, International Longshoremen's Association, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- Superior Oil Co. v. City of Port Arthur, Tex.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1982
- City Capital Resources, Inc. v. WhiteDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.