Legal Opinion

City Capital Resources, Inc. v. White

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided December 4, 1998No. Civil Action 2:98-0543Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HADEN, Chief Judge.

Pending is Defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion to dismiss, without prejudice.

I. PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND

This case was filed in this Court in June 1998, jurisdiction being based on diversity. Plaintiffs assert all plaintiffs are citizens of West Virginia and, because Defendant White is a California citizen, complete diversity exists. On September 10 Defendant moved to dismiss, asserting, inter alia, lack of complete diversity among the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. American Surety Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. John A. Acree v. Air Line Pilots AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  3. Crown Coat Front Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Jim L. Napper and Wife, Jo Ann Napper v. Anderson, Henley, Shields, Bradford & Pritchard, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  5. Jose Estevez v. Horace A. Nabers, Acting Officer in Charge, New Orleans Office Immigration& Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API