Legal Opinion

Obolensky v. G.P. Putnam's Sons

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 3, 1986No. 83 Civ. 3943 (EW)PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Helene Obolensky and Helene Obolensky Enterprises, Inc. sue defendant publisher, G.P. Putnam’s Sons (“Putnam’s”), for damages on numerous causes of action. The factual background to the complaint centers about a book entitled Nureyev, by Clive Barnes (“the Book”), the copyright to which is owned by plaintiffs, and for whose publication plaintiffs entered into negotiations with Putnam’s in May and June 1982. These negotiations terminated in early July 1982 without a signed agreement between the parties, and thereafter plaintiffs published and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Wilkerson v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Clark v. Paul Gray, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Mattivi v. South African Marine Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Arista Records LLC v. GreubelDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2006
  2. Elektra Entertainment Group, Inc. v. BarkerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  3. Bear Creek Productions, Inc. v. SalehDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  4. Aurora World, Inc. v. Ty Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
  5. Kaplan v. ShapiroDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API