Legal Opinion

Haywood Securities, Inc. v. Ehrlich

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 2007No. CV-06-0280-SAPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RYAN, Justice.

¶ 1 A judgment is appealable under Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 12-2101 (2003) only if it complies with the re quirements of Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure 58(a). State v. Birmingham, 96 Ariz. 109, 112, 392 P.2d 775, 777 (1964). Rule 58(a) requires that “all judgments shall be in writing and signed by a judge.”

¶ 2 In this case, we must decide whether a typed signature of a judge in the “/s/ Name ” format on an electronically filed judgment complies with the requirement of Rule 58(a) that judgments be “signed.” We hold that it does.

I

A

¶3 At issue is the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. BirminghamArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Twin City Fire Insurance v. BurkeArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Devenir Associates v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. AguilarArizona Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State Ex Rel. Romley v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Baker v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  2. Steven Sholem v. Hons. gass/contes/melissa LangevinArizona Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Allstate Utility Construction, LLC v. Towne BankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  4. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  5. Dale A. Scoggins and Alvin E. Nelson Jr. v. Native Community Capital, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2023

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API