Legal Opinion

Teniah Tercero v. Sacramento Logistics, LLC, et al.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 3, 2025No. 2:24-cv-00953Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TENIAH TERCERO, No. 2:24-cv-00953-DC-JDP 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND 14 SACRAMENTO LOGISTICS, LLC, et al., GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND AND REMANDING THIS 15 Defendants. ACTION TO THE SACRAMENTO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 16 (Doc. Nos. 34, 35) 17 18 This matter came before the court on June 13, 2025 for a hearing on Plaintiff’s motion for 19 reconsideration and motion to remand this action to the Sacramento County Superior Court. (Doc. 20 Nos. 34,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Antonio Abrego Abrego v. The Dow Chemical Co Shell Oil Company, D/B/A Shell Chemical Company, and Shell Agricultural Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. Livadas v. BradshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API