State v. Ellis-Strong
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
*534OPINION
KIRK, Judge
Appellant Joe Anthony Darnell Ellis-Strong challenges his conviction of first-degree criminal sexual conduct, arguing that the district court erred in denying his presentence motion to withdraw his guilty plea because he was denied effective assistance of counsel. Because Ellis-Strong’s trial counsel affirmatively misadvised him concerning the length of the predatory-offender registration period, we conclude that counsel’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness. We reverse, because if Ellis-Strong can successfully show ineffective assistance of…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Hinton v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Henry Edsel Holmes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dantzler v. TegelsDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2024
- Fidele Ndaruhutse v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
- In the Matter of the Welfare of: E. J. C. L., ChildCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2025
- State of Minnesota v. Marvel Galvaston WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024