Legal Opinion

State v. Ellis-Strong

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 19, 2017No. A16-1260PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*534OPINION

KIRK, Judge

Appellant Joe Anthony Darnell Ellis-Strong challenges his conviction of first-degree criminal sexual conduct, arguing that the district court erred in denying his presentence motion to withdraw his guilty plea because he was denied effective assistance of counsel. Because Ellis-Strong’s trial counsel affirmatively misadvised him concerning the length of the predatory-offender registration period, we conclude that counsel’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness. We reverse, because if Ellis-Strong can successfully show ineffective assistance of…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Hinton v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. Henry Edsel Holmes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dantzler v. TegelsDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2024
  2. Fidele Ndaruhutse v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
  3. In the Matter of the Welfare of: E. J. C. L., ChildCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2025
  4. State of Minnesota v. Marvel Galvaston WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API