Matson v. Housing Auth. of Pittsburgh
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge:
This is an appeal from an order of an en banc Common Pleas Court, Allegheny County, which granted summary judgment based on the application of the doctrine of offensive collateral estoppel. We reverse.
The factual history of this appeal reveals that appellees were former employees of appellant, Housing Authority of the City of Pittsburgh (HACP). Appellees instituted an action in assumpsit to secure payment for the earned but unused sick leave and vacation time they had accumulated upon their retirement from HACP. Their assumpsit claim is based upon certain personnel policies,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schubach v. SilverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Day v. Volkswagenwerk AktiengesellschaftSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- M. B. Guran Company, Inc. v. City of AkronCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. FlaminiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission v. Ammon K. Graybill, Jr., Inc., Real EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Zarnecki v. ShepegiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Banker v. Valley Forge InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Mellon Bank v. RafskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. AnthonySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Kaller's Inc. v. John J. Spencer Roofing, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.