Harris v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BIERY, Justice.
Appellant has filed a motion to abate the appeal and remand the case to the trial court so he may file an out-of-time motion for new trial based on newly discovered evidence. In the verified motion, appellant contends that the State’s main witness, Lonnie Hood, was an undercover operator who testified that he bought controlled substances from appellant. According to appellant, Hood has served as a hired undercover operator for several law enforcement agencies throughout Texas, and he has been indicted in Mitchell County, Texas, for perjury regarding his grand jury…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Rezac v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Garcia v. DialCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Shute v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Ex Parte AdamsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Carter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Oldham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Ex Parte CastellanoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Bowler v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1992
- Stone v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1996
- Crowell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.