Legal Opinion

Bowler v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided January 8, 1992No. 04-90-00680-CRPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON APPELLANT’S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT RECORD

CARR, Justice.

Appellant has filed a motion to supplement the record. The motion states that appellant has brought to the attention of appellate counsel that certain matters were discussed between appellant and trial counsel, and that these matters are essential to appellant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Appellant seeks leave to include in the record his own affidavit concerning these matters. In the alternative, appellant asks for an evidentiary hearing in the trial court on this matter.

In the affidavit, appellant states that he asked…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WalkerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  2. Farris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Chambers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1946
  4. Harris v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1991
  5. Warren v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Oldham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  2. M.B. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
  3. Gonzales v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  4. Green v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  5. Bill Buck Spoon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2003

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API