Legal Opinion

Freligh v. McGrew

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 21, 1932No. Docket No. 4572PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, Acting P. J.

The plaintiff began this action to recover the sum of $1,000, and also to obtain a decree of the trial court rescinding and setting aside a certain indenture of lease entered into between the plaintiff and the defendant Susan B. McGrew. Other parties were named as defendants, but this appeal involves only the defendant Susan B. McGrew.

The complaint sets forth two causes of action. The first is a simple cause of action alleging the indebtedness of the defendant to the plaintiff in the sum of $1,000, and praying for a judgment for the recovery of that sum. The second cause of action is to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bliss v. SneathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Brown v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Cal. Safe Deposit & Tr. Co. v. Sierra Valleys Ry.California Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Union Oil Co. v. Purissima Hills Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Freligh v. McGrewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Thomas Tabor and Agnes F. Tabor v. Teresa C. UlloaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  2. Miller v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. AmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Tennesen v. Prudential Insurance of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API