Legal Opinion
Tennesen v. Prudential Insurance of America
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 27, 1935No. Civ. No. 5349PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
One question only is involved on this appeal. The suit is based on an insurance policy on the life of the deceased husband of the plaintiff. It is contended the superior court had no jurisdiction to determine the cause for the reason that the pleadings confer exclusive jurisdiction on the Municipal Court of Los Angeles County under the statutory provisions. (Stats. 1925, p. 648, and amendments thereof; 2 Deering’s Gen. Laws of 1931, p. 2925, Act 5238, sec. 29; sec. 89, Code Civ. Proc.)
The complaint was filed by the appellant in the superior court. It contains three counts. The issuing of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brix v. Peoples Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Shipp v. Superior Court of San Bernardino Cty.California Supreme Court · 1930
- Freligh v. McGrewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
3Cited by5 opinions
- St. James Church of Christ Holiness v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Jacobson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Hebert v. GrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- In Re CarmenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- In Re CarmenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957