Legal Opinion

Consumers Co. v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1926No. 16526. Judgment reversed; award set asidePublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice DeYoung

Frank Hill filed with the Industrial Commission an application for the adjustment of his claim for compensation against the Consumers Company. He charged that on December 18, 1922, he suffered injuries through frost-bite while engaged in shoveling coal. On the hearing before the arbitrator it was stipulated that Hill was at the time an employee of the Consumers Company; that both parties were under the Workmen's Compensation act, and that the employer was notified of the accident and that demand for compensation was made within the time prescribed by the act. The arbitrator awarded Hill $12…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Larke v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  3. McManaman's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  4. Alzina Construction Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
  5. State ex rel. Virginia & Rainy Lake Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Illinois Country Club, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Gesmundo v. BushSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
  3. King v. Alabam's Freight Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Ceisel v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
  5. American Freight Forwarding Corp. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1964

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API