Legal Opinion
ISIDRO
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2012No. ID 3756PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
25 I&N Dec. 829
(BIA 2012) Interim Decision #3756 Matter of Valentin ISIDRO-Zamorano, Respondent Decided June 15, 2012 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals An applicant for cancellation of removal whose son or daughter met the definition of a “child” when the application was filed but turned 21 before the Immigration Judge adjudicated the application on the merits no longer has a qualifying relative under section 240A(b)(1)(D) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(D) (2006). Matter of Bautista Gomez,
23…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Clark v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Hector Montero-Martinez Gregorio Pedro Montero-Hernandez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Jorge Ibarra-Flores v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Ali Padash v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Alberto Mendez-Garcia v. Loretta LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Martinez-Perez v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Hector Diaz-Arellano v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2024
- Rangel-Fuentes v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
- Arevalo-VargasBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2026
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.