Legal Opinion

Warren v. Detlefsen

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 16, 1984No. 83-231PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Darrel Hickman, Justice.

Mike Detlefsen and others filed suit to enjoin the construction of two duplexes in the Warren Subdivision 3 in El Dorado, Arkansas. This subdivision is one of three adjoining residential neighborhoods which were part of a development by the Warrens through their partnership, the Warren Construction Company. The chancellor held that the Warrens should be enjoined from building the duplexes based on the restrictive covenants contained in the deeds of the appellees and the representations made by the Warrens concerning the development of the three subdivisions. In finding…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. HarrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  2. Shermer v. HaynesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  3. Linder Corp. v. PyeattSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. River Birch Associates v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. SKYLINE WOODS HOMEOWNERS v. BroekemeierNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Egan v. Catholic Bishop of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Mancuso v. Burton Farm Development Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  5. Knowles v. AndersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API