People v. Seneca Insurance
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*956Opinion
BROWN, J.
In this case, we decide whether Penal Code1 section 1166, which governs release of a convicted defendant on bail pending sentencing, applies in the case of a conviction by guilty plea. We conclude that section 1166 does not apply in this context. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeal.
Factual and Procedural Background
A criminal complaint filed on July 30, 1999, charged Seung Hyun Noh (Noh) with seven counts of receiving stolen property. (§ 496, subd. (a).) On September 11, 1999, Seneca Insurance Company (Seneca) posted a bail bond to secure Noh’s release…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Diamond Multimedia Systems, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. ValladoliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. United Bonding InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. WilcoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- People v. StatumCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re Zeth S.California Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. Granite State InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- People v. ACCREDITED SUR. & CAS. CO., INC.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- People v. BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Jeanene Harlick v. Blue Shield of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.