Legal Opinion

Lambeth v. Bogart

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 9, 1942No. 35,502PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*414The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.:

This action was instituted to foreclose a mechanic’s lien on an oil and gas lease. Judgment was for plaintiff, and plaintiff appeals from a subsequent judgment which modified the first judgment.

The appeal involves only one of the defendants, Frances W. Bogart, appellee. Personal service was had on her in the foreclosure action. She filed no answer, and on July 15, 1941, a default judgment was rendered against her .in personam in the sum of $319.88, and the lien was foreclosed. The property was sold at sheriff’s sale and the sale was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Heniff v. ClausenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  2. Chicago Lumber & Coal Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  3. Christie v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  4. Mercantile Firm of O. Fagerberg & Brother v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. BingerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  2. Carrington v. British American Oil Producing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  3. Davidson v. McKownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  4. Dupont v. Lotus Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  5. Quick, Receiver v. PurcellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API