Brumwell v. Premo
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
This is the second of two cases that this court decides today regarding the interpretation and application of OEC 503(4)(c), the breach-of-duty exception to the lawyer-client privilege, OEC 503(2). In Longo v. Premo, 355 Or 525, 326 P3d 1152 (2014), we construed OEC 503(4)(c) to be a limited exception permitting disclosures of confidential information only as necessary for a lawyer to defend against allegations of breach of duty, and we directed the issuance of a peremptory writ of mandamus requiring a post-conviction court to issue a protective order. For the reasons that follow, we…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Automotive Emporium, Inc. v. MurchisonOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Johnson v. RichardsonOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. BrumwellOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- State ex rel. Automobile Emporium, Inc. v. MurchisonOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Longo v. PremoOregon Supreme Court · 2014
3Cited by3 opinions
- Longo v. PremoOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- Johnson v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- Johnson v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017