Legal Opinion
People v. Foster
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided February 3, 1887PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Exceptions from Allegan before judgment. (Arnold, J.) Respondent was convicted of selling fermented liquor, as a •druggist, without giving either of the bonds required by Act No. 259, Laws of 1881. The facts are stated in the ■opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.
Respondent was arrested on a warrant •charging him with selling and furnishing—
“ To Marshall Gilland a certain quantity, to wit, two glasses,•of fermented liquor, to wit, cider, as a beverage, without first having executed and delivered to the county treasurer of Allegan county the bond required by section thirteen (13) of Act No. 259 of the Public Acts of Michigan for the year 1881, or the bond required by section nine of said act; he, the said Albert R. Foster, being then and there a person whose business consisted in part of the sale of drugs and medicines, and said liquors not being then…
2Cited by4 opinions
- People v. CareyMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- People v. EmmonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Hill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
- People v. McCoyMichigan Supreme Court · 1922