People v. Riviezzo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant contends that his plea of guilty should be vacated as he was not advised, at the time of the plea allocution, of his rights to remain silent and to confront witnesses. Having failed either to move to withdraw his plea on this ground prior to the imposition of sentence (see, CPL 220.60 [3]) or to vacate the judgment pursuant to CPL 440.10, the defendant has not preserved for appellate review the issue of the sufficiency of the plea allocution (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Claudio, 64 NY2d 858; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636; People v Mattocks, 100 AD2d 944). In any event, were…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. PellegrinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. KazepisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- People v. McRayNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. ClaudioNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. BartlettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. DavenportAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. HamptonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. SewardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991