Legal Opinion
People v. Davenport
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 16, 2000PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Having failed either to move to withdraw his guilty plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction, defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that the plea colloquy is insufficient because County Court did not advise him of his constitutional right to confront his accusers or the requirement that a verdict be unanimous (see, People v Riviezzo, 124 AD2d 837, lv denied 69 NY2d 832; People v Orr, 111 AD2d 937, 938, lv denied 66 NY2d 766; see generally, People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665). In any event, that contention lacks merit. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. WelsherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. GuerroneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. RiviezzoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. KearnsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. RoddyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. CaveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000