Legal Opinion
Kranker v. Levitt
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 14, 1971PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohn H. Pennock, J.
This is a motion by the plaintiffs for summary judgment in this declaratory judgment action on the ground that there are no triable issues of fact. The defendant cross-moves concomitantly for summary judgment on the ground that there is no issue of fact.
The complaint avers that the plaintiff, Abraham Kranker, is 68 years of age and has been a member of the Employees Retirement System of the State of New York since February, 1941, and has over 30 years’ membership in the Employees Retirement System; that he is eligible for retirement at any time; that he has 25 days of unused vacation credits…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of New York v. New York City Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1908
- The People v. . the Home Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1883
- People Ex Rel. Williams v. . DaytonNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Power v. . Village of AthensNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
3Cited by8 opinions
- Simonds v. New York State Teachers' Retirement SystemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- Kleinfeldt v. New York City Employees' Retirement SystemNew York Supreme Court · 1973
- Auer v. DysonNew York Supreme Court · 1981
- Doctors Council v. New York City Employees' Retirement SystemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Charles v. ReganNew York Supreme Court · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.