Legal Opinion
Doctors Council v. New York City Employees' Retirement System
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 5, 1987PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Sullivan, J.
Plaintiffs, seven part-time doctors employed by the City of New York or the New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation (HHC), joined by their collective bargaining representative, Doctors Council, have brought this action seeking, inter alia, a declaration that they are entitled to membership in the New York City Employees’ Retirement System (NYCERS). Defendants, NYCERS and the chairman of its board of trustees and its Executive Director seek a declaration also that membership is limited to employees in full-time city service. Both sides moved for summary…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lanza v. WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Village of Belle Terre v. BoraasSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Howard v. WymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Incorporated Village of Hempstead v. Public Employment Relations BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Walter v. City of New York Police DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Incorporated Village of Old Field v. CosgroveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Chrislex Staffing Ltd. v. New York State Department of HealthNew York Supreme Court · 2003