Legal Opinion
Auer v. Dyson
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 4, 1981PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
John R. Tenney, J.
The plaintiffs, Martin S. Auer and Lawrence Sloane, bring this action against the Power Authority of the State of New York (PASNY) and the Chase Manhattan Bank. They act in their capacity as residential consumers of electricity supplied by the Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, which purchases electricity from PASNY.
The Power Authority of the State of New York was originally established in 1931 under chapter 772 of the Laws of 1931 which has been amended on numerous occasions, the most recent being chapter 55 of the Laws of 1979.
The plaintiffs are seeking…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Howard v. WymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Peters v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Morrill v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Mtr. Lezette v. Bd. of Educ., HudsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Barry v. O'ConnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Niagara County v. Power AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Hampton Heights Development Corp. v. Board of Water SupplyNew York Supreme Court · 1987
- Occidental Chemical Corp. v. Power AuthorityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1992
- Auer v. DysonNew York Supreme Court · 1984
- NIAGARA COUNTY v. POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW, YORKAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011