Legal Opinion

Fulton v. William Beaumont Hospital

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 20, 2002No. Docket 225174PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*72Talbot, P.J.

In this medical malpractice action, defendants1 appeal by leave granted from the trial court’s order denying their motion for summary disposition. We reverse.

I. FACTS

On February 15, 1995, Julie Fulton went to see Dr. Deborah Eldridge, a specialist in obstetrics and gynecology, for a prenatal examination. Dr. Eldridge performed an examination and noted that Fulton’s cervix was long, closed, thick, and friable, meaning that it bled easily. Dr. Eldridge believed that these conditions were not abnormal for a pregnant woman such as Fulton. Dr. Eldridge also performed a routine pap…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Quinto v. Cross and Peters Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Sun Valley Foods Co. v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Roberts v. Mecosta County General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Weymers v. KheraMichigan Supreme Court · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. AkinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Ensink v. Mecosta County General HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. O’neal v. St John Hospital & Medical CenterMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Stone v. WilliamsonMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Taylor v. Kent Radiology, PCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API