Legal Opinion

Barrera v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 2017No. S-16-0296PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Justice.

[¶1] Mario Barrera appeals his felony, conviction for taking a controlled substance into a jail.1 The statute governing that offense, Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-5-208 (LexisNexis 2017), proyides in pertinent part, “Except as authorized by a person in charge, a person commits a felony ... if that person takes or passes any controlled substance or intoxicating liquor into a jail[.]" We affirm.

ISSUES

[¶2] Barrera raises three issues. We restate and rearrange them as follows.

I. Can an arrestee, whose presence at a jail is involuntary, nevertheless voluntarily take controlled substances…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Granzer v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  3. Causey v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Seymore v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Reilly v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hopkins v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Daniel E. Borja, Sr. v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2023
  3. Farnsworth v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
  4. State v. GneitingIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
  5. State v. HinostrozaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API