Barrera v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Justice.
[¶1] Mario Barrera appeals his felony, conviction for taking a controlled substance into a jail.1 The statute governing that offense, Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-5-208 (LexisNexis 2017), proyides in pertinent part, “Except as authorized by a person in charge, a person commits a felony ... if that person takes or passes any controlled substance or intoxicating liquor into a jail[.]" We affirm.
ISSUES
[¶2] Barrera raises three issues. We restate and rearrange them as follows.
I. Can an arrestee, whose presence at a jail is involuntary, nevertheless voluntarily take controlled substances…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Granzer v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Causey v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
- Seymore v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- Reilly v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hopkins v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
- Daniel E. Borja, Sr. v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2023
- Farnsworth v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. GneitingIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. HinostrozaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.