Legal Opinion

Environmental Safety & Control Corp. v. Board of Education of Camden Central School District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 31, 1992No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

There is a triable issue of fact which precludes plaintiff’s claim for partial summary judgment on its claim for additional work (see, Balport Constr. Co. v New York Tel. Co., 111 AD2d 360). The contract provisions with respect to the amount of work to be performed under Alternate #2, which provided for the abatement of asbestos in the dirt floor located in the crawlspace under the school building, are ambiguous. Alternate #2 of the contract appears to require plaintiff to clean 22,867 square feet of dirt floor. Addendum 2 of the contract, however, limits the dirt floor square footage under…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. Long Island Rail RoadNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Amusement Business Underwriters v. American International Group, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. River Park Associates v. Meyerbank Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. Stage v. Village of OwegoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  5. Stage v. Village of OwegoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rondout Valley Central School District v. Coneco Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 2004
  2. Environmental Safety & Control Corp. v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. RKI Construction, LLC v. WDF Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2020
  4. Sweetser v. NETSMART TECHNOLOGIES, INC.District Court, D. Maine · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API