Legal Opinion

Haggard v. Curry

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 12, 2010No. 10-16819PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The panel has voted to deny the petitioner’s motion for reconsideration en banc. Pursuant to General Order 6.11, the full court has been advised of the Motion for Reconsideration En Banc, and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc.

The Motion for Reconsideration En Banc is accordingly DENIED, and the court’s Order of October 12, 2010 is AMENDED to appear as set forth below. No further motions for reconsideration or reconsideration en banc will be considered.

OPINION AND ORDER

2Per curiam

In this case, the California Board of Parole Hearings (“Board”) denied state prisoner…

3Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Ylst v. NunnemakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Board of Pardons v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by19 opinions

  1. East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  2. Lair v. BullockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. Innovation Law Lab v. Chad WolfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  4. (HC) Arciga v. FrauenheimDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  5. Bradford v. BeanDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API