Legal Opinion
Lair v. Bullock
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 26, 2015No. Nos. 12-35809, 12-35889PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed on May 26, 2015 is replaced by the amended opinion filed concurrently with this order. With these amendments, Judges Bea and Murguia have voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Fisher so recommends.
The suggestion for rehearing en banc has been circulated to the full court, and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35(b). The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.
No further petitions shall be entertained.
OPINION
BEA, Circuit Judge:
We are called on to determine whether Montana’s dollar limits on…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Nken v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Kim Brown-Hunter v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Arizona Students' Ass'n v. Arizona Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Christopher Garnier v. Michelle O'connor-RatcliffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- United States v. Steven DuarteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.