Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. DiEMIDIO

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 15, 1962No. Appeals, 141 and 143PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Woodside, J.,

This is an appeal from the judgments of sentence imposed upon two defendants after motions for arrest of judgments were refused by the court below.

Andrew A. DiEmidio and Joseph E. Yobbagy were each indicted for statutory extortion, common law extortion and conspiracy. A jury found DiEmidio guilty of common law extortion and conspiracy and he was sentenced to a fine and five months in jail. It found Yobbagy guilty of conspiracy only, and he was sentenced to a fine and three months in jail. Both defendants contend that they should be discharged because of an omission in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StrantzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Commonwealth v. HorvathSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Com. v. Benz., Com. v. RoutleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Commonwealth v. Keenan & ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
  5. Commonwealth v. TassoneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. YobbagySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Commonwealth v. RolinskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Commonwealth v. BELGRAVESuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Commonwealth v. BELGRAVESuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Commonwealth v. DiEMIDIOSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API