Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Rolinski

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 15, 1979No. 1707PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, Judge:

This is an appeal from a judgment of sentence for criminal conspiracy, and delivery of methamphetamine in violation of the Controlled Substances Act.

Appellant first argues that the information charging him with delivery of methamphetamine was invalid because it only alleged that he made the delivery “feloniously,” and failed to allege that he made the delivery “knowingly” or “intentionally.”

The provision of the Controlled Substances Act under which appellant was convicted provides, in part: “[ejxcept as authorized by this act, the manufacture, delivery, or possession with intent…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Commonwealth v. YobbagySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Commonwealth v. AckermanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Commonwealth v. BradshawSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. OhleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. AlstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Commonwealth v. BidnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. MoralesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Commonwealth v. ChambersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API