Legal Opinion

Tanquary v. Howard

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1905No. 5019; No. 2570 C. APublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Arapahoe County: Eon. Booth M. Malone, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

The judgment was for the appellee and against the appellant Tanquary and F. E. Carringer jointly. To this judgment they excepted and jointly prayed an appeal which was allowed upon condition that they file a prescribed appeal bond. Carringer, the other judgment debtor, did not, by himself or any other person, sign the appeal bond. It was executed by Tanquary, and for himself only. Tanquary did not pray for nor was a separate appeal granted to him. He prosecutes this appeal in his own behalf and in his own name, without using the name of the other judgment debtor.

Section 400 of our Civil Code…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McIntyre v. SholtyIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Creswell v. HerrColorado Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. Diamond Tunnel Gold & Silver Min. Co. v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  4. Fuller v. Swan River Placer Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1879
  5. Andre v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1872

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnston v. GearyUtah Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Tate v. HollyColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Tate v. HollyColorado Court of Appeals · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API