Legal Opinion

Johnston v. Geary

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1934No. 5089PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff and respondent on a promissory note recovered a joint judgment against all of the three defendants and appellants in the sum of over $2,200, attorney's fees and costs. All of the defendants prosecuted a joint appeal from the judgment by serving and filing a joint notice of appeal, jointly transmitting and filing in this court a transcript of the record on appeal and filing in joint assignment of errors. To perfect an appeal under our statute, Comp. Laws Utah 1917, § 6997, requires an undertaking on appeal with at least two sureties to the effect that the appellant will pay all…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Town of Flagstaff v. GomezArizona Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Hileman v. BealeIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Walker v. Equitable Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  4. Creswell v. HerrColorado Court of Appeals · 1897
  5. Diamond Tunnel Gold & Silver Min. Co. v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Zion's Sav. Bank & Trust Co. v. Mountain-Lakes Poultry Farms, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Zion's Sav. Bank & Trust Co. v. Mountain-Lakes Poultry Farms, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API