Legal Opinion

Cox v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1992No. 91-186PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

Appellant Jay Dee Cox appeals from his conviction for aggravated assault.

We affirm.

Appellant sets forth the following issues on appeal:

I. Whether the failure to properly instruct the jury as to the requirement of the State to show the specific intent of the accused deprived him of his constitutional right to a fair trial and was a clear misinterpretation of the law?

II. Whether the failure to properly instruct the jury that intoxication is a defense to a specific intent crime deprived the accused of his constitutional right to a fair trial and was reversible error?

III. Whether…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Crozier v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Goodman v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Sanchez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Goodman v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Jennings v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Derek Earl Hill v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Sam v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
  3. United States v. MozeeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  4. Grainey v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Streitmatter v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API