Legal Opinion · Dissent

Voris v. Eikel

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 17, 1952No. 13953_1Published

1DissentRives, Circuit Judge

Leslie Lovely, the gang foreman, and Ernest Wisby, the walking foreman, each testified that he had actual knowledge of the claimant’s injury on the night that it occurred. Irrespective of the manner and duration of their employment, both Lovely and Wisby were then .employees of the Southern Stevedoring & Contracting Company, and it was responsible for their acts and omissions within the scope of their employment the same as if they had been selected without the aid of a union and their duties were to extend over years. Wisby was the man who hired Earl Porter, the claimant. He was in charge of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Claim of Hughes v. Trustees of St. Patrick's CathedralNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Bethlehem Steel Co. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
  3. Branham v. Terminal Shipping Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
  4. Employers' Liability Assur. Corp. v. MonahanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1937
  5. Terminal Shipping Co. v. BranhamDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API