Legal Opinion

Scrivani v. Vallombroso

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 24, 2007No. AC 26315PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

On October 24, 2006, this court heard oral argument and thereafter issued an opinion setting forth the relevant facts, procedural history and applicable law in this case. See Scrivani v. Vallombroso, 99 Conn. App. 645, 916 A.2d 827, cert. denied, 282 Conn. 904, 920 A.2d 309 (2007). In that opinion, we remanded the case for an articulation as to whether in awarding attorney’s fees and punitive damages under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), General Statutes § 42-110a et seq., 1 the court considered the per se CUTPA violations that were based on violations of the Home…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Scrivani v. VallombrosoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kendall v. AmsterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  2. Hees v. Burke Construction Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  3. Hees v. Burke Construction Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API