Winchell v. Schiff
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Douglas, J.:
In this appeal and cross-appeal, we primarily consider whether actual losses resulting from the conversion of inventory include the value of a lost business. We conclude that full recovery for actual losses includes not only the converted inventory, but also resulting damages such as the value of a lost business.
FACTS
Appellant/cross-respondent Calvin Winchell, d/b/a CGL Seafood, Inc., owned and operated a wholesale fresh fish business in Las Vegas, Nevada. Winchell’s business grew from $36,780 in sales in 1996 to $759,711 in 2000. With such dramatic growth, *942Winc…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Edwards v. Emperor's Garden RestaurantNevada Supreme Court · 2006
- Nelson v. HeerNevada Supreme Court · 2007
- Lioce v. CohenNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- Hrnjak v. Graymar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1971
- Evans v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Wyeth v. RowattNevada Supreme Court · 2010
- Road & Highway Builders, LLC v. Northern Nevada Rebar, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2012
- Reyburn Lawn & Landscape Designers, Inc. v. Plaster Development Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 2011
- Las Vegas Development Group, LLC v. YfantisDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2016
- Caraveo v. PerezNevada Supreme Court · 2013
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.