Legal Opinion

Pettola v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 21, 1994PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, Judge.

Anthony Pettola (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed a referee’s decision denying him specific loss benefits under Section 306(c)(8) of The Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act (Act).1 We vacate and remand.

Claimant worked for Sharon Steel Corporation (Employer) for nearly forty years as an electronic arc furnace operator, slitter and laborer. During the course of that employment, Claimant was exposed to loud and continuous noise from various machines operating in close proximity to his work place. Ear protection…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bethenergy Mines, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Bethenergy Mines, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. HartliebSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Boeing Helicopter Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Wells-Moore v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bible v. Commonwealth, Department of Labor & IndustrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Bible v. COM., DEPT. OF LABOR AND IND.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. White v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Aristech Chemical Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API