Dayton Electric Manufacturing Co. v. APCOM, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NORGLE, District Judge.
Before the court is the summary judgment motion of APCOM, Inc. (“APCOM”) and Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. (“Liberty Mutual” or collectively “defendants”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c). The court denies summary judgment for defendants and grants summary judgment, sua sponte, for plaintiff.
FACTS
APCOM manufactures water heater element lines. 1 Dayton Electric Manufacturing Co. (“Dayton”) purchased these water heater elements from APCOM, labeled them as Dayton water heater elements, and sold them to companies for incorporation into water heaters…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bank Leumi Le-Israel, B.M., a Foreign Corporation v. Dennis Lee, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Coach Leatherware Co. v. Anntaylor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Elius Lamar Reed v. Amax Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- McCabe v. Crawford & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
- Browning-Ferris Industries of South Atlantic, Inc. v. Wake CountyDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1995
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Allendale Nursing CentreDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1998
- Home Insurance v. Waycrosse, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.