Legal Opinion

State v. Bowen

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 3, 1984No. 8321SC249PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

Defendant’s principal contention is that the court erred in deciding as a matter of law that the condominium driveway was a “public vehicular area,” thus taking the issue from the jury. The definition of “public vehicular area” applicable to this case is found in G.S. 20-4.01(32) (Cum. Supp. 1981):

Public Vehicular Area. — Any drive, driveway, road, roadway, street, or alley upon the grounds and premises of any public or private hospital, college, university, school, orphanage, church, or any of the institutions maintained and supported by the State of North Carolina, or any of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. AllredCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  4. State v. DancyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  5. State v. LesleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. SnyderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  2. State v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. CarawanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  5. State v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API