Legal Opinion

State v. Carter

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 2, 1972No. 7210SC487PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAHAM, Judge.

The sole question presented is whether the evidence was sufficient to withstand defendant’s motion for nonsuit.

At the time of defendant’s arrest, G.S. 20-138 made it unlawful for a person under the influence of intoxicating liquor “to drive any vehicle upon the highways within this State.” By amendment, effective 1 October 1971, this section was rewritten. It now provides: “It is unlawful . . . for any person who is under the influence of intoxicating liquor to drive or operate any vehicle upon any highway or any public vehicular area within this State.” (Emphasis added.)…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. CutlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. State v. McDonoughSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  3. State v. DeCosterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
  4. State v. EnglehartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  5. State v. HaddockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. CokerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. State v. CannonHawaii Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State v. FuchsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  4. State v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. State v. RayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API