Legal Opinion

Carey v. State Ex Rel. Doughty

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 27, 1937No. 26190PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

This action was commenced by the plaintiffs as resident taxpayers of Major county under section 5965, O. S. 1931, the common informer statute, against C. H. Carey and D. B. Clark, members of the board of county commissioners of that county, 'and J. H. Green and T. W. Reece, road contractors, claimants, to recover twice the amount of a certain claim presented against the county ’by Green and Reece, and allowed and paid by said county commissioners. Major county was made a party defendant as required by said statute. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiffs and against the claimants and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Sapulpa v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Board of County Commissioners v. HarveySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
  3. In Re Wah-Shah-She-Me-Tsa-He's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Miller v. Oklahoma State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Cooper v. ShidlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Powell v. SandefurSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  2. Harden v. B of E Ind. Sch. Dist. No. 22Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  3. Routh v. ToniniSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API