Legal Opinion

Routh v. Tonini

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 25, 1943No. 31340PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArnold, J.

Laura Tonini and North River Insurance Company, a corporation, filed an action against Alice Routh and George I. Routh, Leila Thurman, C. C. Goble, and R. D. Cravens, to foreclose a mortgage on certain real estate located in Comanche county, Okla. Leila Thurman filed a disclaimer. During the trial C. C. Goble also disclaimed any interest in the property. Cravens, one of the defendants in error, set up a judgment lien against the Rouths, plaintiffs in error. Plaintiffs in error denied that the mortgage was in default. As to the judgment lien claimed by Cravens, they alleged payment. The trial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mires v. HoganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. City of Sapulpa v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. Carey v. State Ex Rel. DoughtySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harden v. B of E Ind. Sch. Dist. No. 22Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  2. Hazel v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API