Miller v. Oklahoma State Bank
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Gourt, Jackson County; Frank Mathews, Judge'. Action by the Oklahoma State Bank and others against A. J. Miller and another, and E. >G. Johnson and another intervened. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.
The question herein arises upon a motion by the defendants in error, E. C. Johnson .and S. H. Johnson partners, to dismiss the appeal, as to them, for the .reason that they are not necessary or proper parties thereto. The action originally was one wherein the defendant in error the Oklahoma State Bank was plaintiff and the plaintiffs in error herein were defendants. The movants herein intervened, alleging that they were entitled to judgment against the Millers upon a promissory note and the foreclosure of a mortgage upon the property involved in the suit between the bank and the Millers.…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Nunn v. BrillhartTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Moline Plow Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Moline Plow Co. v. HoovenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Carey v. State Ex Rel. DoughtySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- McGraw Tire & Rubber Co. v. BartonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927