Glauner v. Miller
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
Dale Glauner appeals from the district court’s Rule 12(b)(6) judgment of dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. He asserts that Nevada Revised Statutes § 213.1214,2 which requires a panel to certify that certain sexual offenders are not a “menace to the health, safety or morals of others” prior to parole eligibility, is facially unconstitutional. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the constitutionality of a state statute, and we affirm. See Crawford v. Lungren, 96 F.3d 380, 384 (9th Cir.1996) (providing for de novo review).
Glauner is a Nevada state prisoner,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- City of Chicago v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Jordan v. De GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- United States v. WhitlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Hess v. BD. OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISIONCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Lee v. WithrowDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
- Kissane v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Valle-MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.