Legal Opinion
Alarm Detection Sys., Inc. v. Vill. of Schaumburg, Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 15, 2019No. 18-3316PublishedCited by 153 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
St. Eve, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is one of two we decide today regarding the market for commercial fire-alarm services in Chicago's suburbs. The current case takes us to the Village of Schaumburg.
In 2016, Schaumburg passed an ordinance that requires commercial buildings to send fire-alarm signals directly to the local 911 dispatch center. That decision, sensible as it may seem, comes at an economic cost: as implemented, the ordinance threatens to exclude from the market all but one alarm-system provider. This is because the area's dispatch center, Northwest Central Dispatch System…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by153 opinions
- John Doe v. University of Southern IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022
- Always Towing & Recovery Inc. v. City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
- Gennadiy Nekrilov v. City of Jersey CityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
- Cylinda Scott v. University of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
- AEGEAN, LLC v. MERIDIAN SENIOR LIVING, LLC (DELAWARE)District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2019
148 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.