Legal Opinion
Marybeth Lauderdale v. Illinois Department of Human S
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 30, 2017No. 16-3830PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KANNE, Circuit Judge.
Marybeth Lauderdale alleges she was paid substantially less than her male colleague despite taking on twice the responsibility. The Equal Pay Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the Equal Protection Clause of. the Fourteenth Amendment prohibit state employers from paying an employee less based on her sex. However, the record indicates that the pay discrepancy in this case was not based on sex. Therefore, the district court’s grant of summary judgment for the defendants-ap-pellees is affirmed.
I. Background
Marybeth Lauderdale served as acting superintendent…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Anne Dey v. Colt Construction & Development CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Mary J. Riordan v. William L. Kempiners and Shirley RandolphCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Bass v. Joliet Public School District No. 86Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Silva v. StateCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Gregory Barnes v. Board of Trustees of the UniveCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Gloria Terry v. Gary Community School CorporaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Cheryl Kellogg v. Ball State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
- Renfroe v. Iac Greencastle, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2019
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.