Legal Opinion
Trident Const. Co., Inc. v. Austin Co.
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided July 16, 2003No. CIV.A. 2:02-0702-18PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
NORTON, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 59 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 1 For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion is granted.
1. Background 2
The Austin Company (“Austin”) is a global company that designs and con structs industrial facilities. (Lockwood Depo. at 11-12.) Trident Construction Company, Inc. (“Trident”) is a construction contractor in Charleston. In 1999, Austin identified a notice published by the Naval Facilities Engineering Command (“the Navy”) in…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Perini Corporation v. Perini Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- Sauner v. Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Campbell v. Cathcart (In Re Derivium Capital LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2006
- International Waste Industries Corp. v. Cape Environmental Management, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Stevens & Wilkinson of South Carolina, Inc. v. City of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
- Arabi Gin Co. v. Plexus Cotton, Ltd. (In re Joseph Walker & Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2014
- Moss v. Goodrich CorporationDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2022