Legal Opinion

Pickett v. . Fulford

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 27, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.

The principal question presented by the appeal is the correctness of the ruling of the court below that the note and deed of trust in the hands of the plaintiff, though acquired after maturity, were not subject to equities and defenses in favor of the makers by reason of an alleged agreement between them and R. H. Rigsbee, unless R. H. Rigsbee had purchased or become the holder of the note and deed of trust.

The controverted issue around which the trial below revolved was whether R. H. Rigsbee, pursuant to an agreement with the appellants, purchased the note and deed of trust with funds of the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Potts v. Life Insurance Co. of VirginiaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  2. Harris v. . BurwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1871
  3. Barnes v. . CrawfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. Capell v. . LongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  5. Stegal v. Union Bank & Federal Trust Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1934

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. CREDIGY RECEIVABLES, INC. v. WhittingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  2. Bullin v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. Bethesda Rd. PartnersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API