Legal Opinion

Heyl v. Taylor

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 15, 1909PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from two orders of the City Court of the city of New York, one denying a motion made hy the plaintiff and the other granting a motion made by the defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtSeabury, J.

The plaintiff herein has recovered a judgment against the defendant upon which execution was issued, supplementary proceedings taken and a receiver in such proceeding duly appointed. At the time of the commencement of the proceedings supplementary to execution, the defendant was domiciled in the State of Connecticut, and had an office for the transaction of business in the city of Hew York. The defendant is the owner of certain real property situated in the State of Connecticut. After the appointment of the receiver in supplementary proceedings, an action was com*32menced in the State of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ward v. . BoyceNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Lamb v. HirschbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McNish v. BurchSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Eisenstadt Manufacturing Co. v. St. Louis Smelting & Refining Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API